[Tech] [statecom] Let the voter's speak!

[Merelice]

Greetings,

It would interest me to hear why the ballot-questions email list(s)
should be closed and why it/they should be hosted elsewhere (even if
they are non-partisan). It's important that we "label" the work that
the party does.

Merelice

On 4/16/08, Jamie O'Keefe <jokeefe at jamesokeefe.org> wrote:
> Ok, well keep me/tech folks informed.  We can set it up that folks
>  need moderator approval to be on, though that is not our standard
>  operating procedure.  I'll check with Dan on that.  The list sends out
>  notices to the admins when someone joins or removes herself.
>
>  If Ken may not always be the initial contact person, then it would be
>  good to have an alias, say ballotquestions at green-rainbow.org, so that
>  folks know there is one place to email.
>
>  Jamie
>
>  On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:06 AM, John Andrews <jandrews166 at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Jamie,
>  >
>  > Thanks for offering to help!
>  >
>  > I'm sure that the Advisory Ballot Working Group will want its own list for
>  > its  own agenda and strategy work.  It could be called
>  > "ballot_questions_group". This should be a closed list in which an
>  > administrator has to add your email.  After that, it isn't clear what we
>  > need.  The ABWG might want to have a public list.  The ballot committees for
>  > each separate question may want their own list.  But since these committees
>  > are nominally nonpartisan, it might be better to host them somewhere else.
>  > I'd wait until the ABWG can discuss this to decide what to do.
>  >
>  > Ken should say if he's willing to be the initial administrator.  He could
>  > pass the job on to someone else once the ABWG starts meeting.
>  >
>  > - John